WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥� A Senate committee voted along party lines Thursday to over his refusal to answer questions at a hearing on his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, setting up a referral to the Justice Department for potential investigation over whether the country’s longtime top properly exercised his constitutional rights.
A department spokesperson confirmed Thursday evening that the department had received the contempt referral, is “reviewing it and will work with the Senate accordingly.鈥�
The vote approving the contempt resolution came a week against self-incrimination more than 100 times when he appeared before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, an episode that raised fresh legal questions about the ability of Congress to compel testimony from a previously pardoned witness.
Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, the committee chairman who pressed for the contempt finding, said that constitutional protection did not apply because and thus did not have to worry about the threat of prosecution.
鈥淒r. Fauci faced no risk of federal prosecution,” Paul said at the outset of Thursday’s vote. “All he had to do was tell the truth.鈥�
He told colleagues that the issue before them was not Fauci’s opinions, policies or 鈥渁nything he said from a podium six years ago.鈥�
Instead, he added, 鈥淲e were voting on whether a witness who has received the benefit of a sweeping federal pardon can be ordered by this committee to answer questions and then defy that order without consequence.鈥�
Fauci, in a statement last week explaining his decision to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights, said he had good reason to fear the possibility of criminal charges given what he said was Paul’s determination 鈥渢o get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, quote, behind bars, unquote.”
Fauci’s lawyer, David Schertler, said in a statement that the contempt resolution was “a continuation of Senator Paul鈥檚 personal vendetta against Dr. Fauci, who spent 50 years in public health and has saved countless lives.鈥� Schertler accused Paul of abusing his power by trying to 鈥渨eaponize the Justice Department.鈥�
鈥淭oday鈥檚 partisan committee vote is a crude political stunt intended to punish Dr. Fauci for exercising his constitutional rights,” Schertler said. 鈥淭he Senate should reject Senator Paul鈥檚 meritless and politically-motivated contempt resolution. For years, Senator Paul has proclaimed to anyone who would listen that Dr. Fauci should be prosecuted and put in prison. Dr. Fauci has committed no crime 鈥� and Senator Paul knows it.鈥�
The pardon from Biden covered acts from 2014 through the January 2025 day it was issued, but does not shield him from state-level prosecutions or protect him from federal investigations into any testimony he did give that lawmakers deemed false. The current Justice Department has as part of what critics have called a retribution campaign.
Democrats who unanimously opposed the contempt resolution agreed with Fauci that he had a well-founded fear of self-incrimination given the publicly stated desires of Republican lawmakers, including Paul, to see him prosecuted in connection with COVID. given Biden鈥檚 frequent use of an autopen to conduct official business.
鈥淭he goal was to wait for Dr. Fauci to make any kind of misstatement and then have a weaponized Department of Justice file criminal charges for that new statement that would not have been covered by the pardon, leaving Dr. Fauci little choice but to invoke his constitutional right to not walk directly into a trap,鈥� said Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., before the vote.
Trump himself weighed in Thursday at the White House, noting in response to a reporter’s question that two advisers from his first term, and , were jailed on contempt charges during the Biden administration after they defied congressional subpoenas and refused to even show up for their scheduled hearings.
鈥淲hen you see that happen, you sort of say maybe he should,鈥� Trump said of Fauci being prosecuted. 鈥淲hat he did is far more serious than a lot of crimes, frankly.鈥�
Paul’s decision to send the referral directly to the Justice Department would leave it to prosecutors in Washington to decide whether to investigate or potentially attempt to prosecute Fauci for contempt. A referral from Congress does not compel the Justice Department to act.
The committee’s top Democrat, Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, questioned whether the referral would be legally valid if Paul did not seek a vote before the full Senate, where the 60 votes needed to pass the resolution are seen as unlikely. He said punishing a witness for exercising a constitutional right against self-incrimination would complicate future efforts by Congress to conduct oversight and compel appearances and testimony.
鈥淚f this committee now seeks to punish a witness for asserting their (constitutionally) protected Fifth Amendment rights, future witnesses will argue that appearing before Congress exposes them to punishment regardless of whether they comply with a subpoena and invoke a constitutional protection,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey will point directly to this vote 鈥� this vote 鈥� as a justification for refusing to appear at all.鈥�
Copyright © 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
