This article was republished with permission from 小萝莉影视’s news partners at .听Sign up for today.
This content was republished with permission from 小萝莉影视鈥檚 news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for听听迟辞诲补测.
The lead federal agency charged with reviewing a proposed high-speed train between Baltimore and Washington, D.C. has “paused” its evaluation of the project.
The Federal Railroad Administration鈥檚 decision to suspend its review will 鈥� at a minimum 鈥�
delay the controversial 鈥淪uper-Conducting Maglev鈥� proposal.
Whether it represents a true setback won鈥檛 be known for some time.
The rail agency鈥檚 decision to pause its review was posted to the 鈥溾�� established to help the public track federal infrastructure projects.
It came after the agency received 4,000 comments during a public feedback period.
The decision gives the agency the opportunity to review the complex project in more detail, address concerns about it, and consult with other agencies.
鈥淔RA looks forward to sharing the revised project [environmental impact statement, or EIS] schedule when it is determined,鈥� a spokesperson said in an email.
The proposed rail line has stirred both supporters and critics. It has the potential to speed travel between the two cities, creating jobs, taking cars off the road and boosting air travel at Thurgood Marshall BWI Airport.
Opponents cite neighborhood impacts, potential park and property loss, high ticket costs, failure risk and jarring vibrations.
On Monday, a judge in Baltimore ruled in favor of a local developer who wants to build a mixed-use development on a听. Baltimore-Washington Rapid Rail, the company behind the high-speed train project, wanted to acquire that choice property through condemnation, to use as a station stop, but the court rejected their claim. An appeal is expected.
Backers of the 鈥淪CMAGLEV鈥� predict the line would be able to carry passengers between Union Station and Cherry Hill in 15 minutes. It would be able to travel up to 311-miles-per-hour, BWRR maintains, through the use of electrified magnets, rather than steel wheels on conventional tracks.
In a statement, BWRR CEO Wayne Rogers offered an upbeat case for the project to advance.
鈥淭he Maglev project is very timely as Hurricane Ida, damaging Annapolis and Edgewater, Air Conditioning听needs in Baltimore schools, sea level rise and flooding in Maryland all point to the urgent need to not only talk but to take action to arrest climate change,鈥� he wrote.
鈥淐ars are the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions. Maglev will remove 16 million cars per year from the highways and make the largest dent in emissions of any initiative in Maryland,鈥� he continued.
Northeast Maglev, a sister company, hopes to one day compete with Amtrak, offering 60-minute trips between Capitol Hill and midtown Manhattan.
An outspoken critic of the project, Susan R. McCutchen, a member of the Maryland Coalition for Responsible Transit, said she is 鈥渃autiously optimistic that, because of the glaring deficiencies in the grossly inadequate [draft environmental impact statement] 鈥� the FRA is considering a supplemental DEIS rather than moving forward with the final EIS.鈥�
bruce@marylandmatters.org
